Current:Home > reviewsHow did each Supreme Court justice vote in today's student loan forgiveness ruling? Here's a breakdown -Wealthify
How did each Supreme Court justice vote in today's student loan forgiveness ruling? Here's a breakdown
View
Date:2025-04-24 15:48:19
The Supreme Court decided 6-3 that the Biden administration does not have the authority to wipe out nearly half-a-trillion dollars in student debt.
The decision denies relief to about 40 million Americans who stood to have up to $20,000 in student debt erased by the plan using the HEROES Act.
There were actually two student loan forgiveness decisions made on Friday: The first was about whether two private citizens had the right to challenge the plan. The court unanimously said that the pair did not have standing, and their challenge was thrown out.
- Read the full text of the decision
However, in the case where the decision to strike down the forgiveness plan was made, the court said that Missouri — one of six states that challenged the plan — did have legal standing. This allowed the court to consider whether the secretary of education could use the HEROES Act to forgive student loan debt.
Here's how the court voted on that case.
Supreme Court justices who voted against student loan forgiveness
The Supreme Court's decision fell along ideological lines, much like Thursday's decision to end race-based affirmative action.
Chief Justice John Roberts voted against the student loan forgiveness plan and delivered the majority opinion, saying that U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona has the authority to "waive or modify" the HEROES Act, but not "rewrite that statute from the ground up."
"The Secretary's comprehensive debt cancellation plan cannot fairly be called a waiver—it not only nullifies existing provisions, but augments and expands them dramatically. It cannot be mere modification, because it constitutes 'effectively the introduction of a whole new regime,'" Roberts wrote.
Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett voted with Roberts.
Barrett filed a concurring opinion, writing that the court "can uphold the Secretary of Education's loan cancellation program only if he points to 'clear congressional authorization' for it."
Supreme Court justices who voted to uphold student loan forgiveness
The court's three liberal voices — Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson — all opposed the decision. Kagan filed a dissent where she called the decision to take up the case, let alone vote on it, an "overreach."
"The plaintiffs in this case are six States that have no personal stake in the Secretary's loan forgiveness plan," Kagan wrote. "They are classic ideological plaintiffs: They think the plan a very bad idea, but they are no worse off because the Secretary differs. In giving those States a forum — in adjudicating their complaint — the Court forgets its proper role. The Court acts as though it is an arbiter of political and policy disputes, rather than of cases and controversies."
In the dissent, Kagan wrote that Cardona acted within the "broad authority" provided by the HEROES Act, saying that the decision to alter usual rules "fits comfortably within" the parameters set by the statute.
Melissa Quinn contributed to this report.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Clarence Thomas
- Student Debt
- Student Loan
- Student Loans
- Ketanji Brown Jackson
- Miguel Cardona
- John Roberts
Kerry Breen is a news editor and reporter for CBS News. Her reporting focuses on current events, breaking news and substance use.
veryGood! (59598)
Related
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Coach keeps QB Deshaun Watson on sideline as Browns upend Colts: 'I wanted to protect him'
- Danish deputy prime minister leaves politics but his party stays on in the center-right government
- 2 New York hospitals resume admitting emergency patients after cyberattack
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- Bill Belichick finally gets 300th career regular-season win as Patriots upset Bills
- Stranger Things' Joe Keary and Chase Sui Wonders Have Very Cheeky Outing
- James Patterson says checked egos are key to co-author success, hints at big actor collab
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- Georgetown women's basketball coach Tasha Butts dies after battle with breast cancer
Ranking
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- Ukrainians prepare firewood and candles to brace for a winter of Russian strikes on the energy grid
- Warrant says Minnesota investigators found meth in house after gunbattle that wounded 5 officers
- 40 years after Beirut’s deadly Marines bombing, US troops again deploying east of the Mediterranean
- Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
- Argentine economy minister has surprise win over populist, and they head toward presidential runoff
- Drivers of Jeep, Kia plug-in hybrids take charging seriously. Here's why that matters.
- Brooklyn Org’s rebrand ditches ‘foundation’ from its name for being ‘old’ and ‘controlling’
Recommendation
Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
Are earthquakes happening more? What to know if you're worried and how to stay safe.
South Korean auto parts maker plans $72.5M plant near new Hyundai facility in Georgia, hiring 500
Two men claim million-dollar prizes from New York Lottery, one from historic July 19 Powerball drawing
Intellectuals vs. The Internet
EPA proposes banning cancer-causing chemical used in automotive care and other products
How long before a phone is outdated? Here's how to find your smartphone's expiration date
South Korean auto parts maker plans $72.5M plant near new Hyundai facility in Georgia, hiring 500